Emerging insights in EMDR highlight its potential to process trauma rooted in early childhood and preverbal experiences, offering new hope for clients with no conscious memory of distressing events.
In EMDR therapy, some clients arrive with clear signs of trauma but no story they can remember. They may describe a sense that “something disturbing” happened, while also struggling with anxiety, attachment difficulties, body-based symptoms, emotional swings, troubled relationships or a persistent sense of shame. Deborah Del Vecchio-Scully, an EMDR clinician and trauma specialist, argues that these presentations can point to preverbal trauma: distress rooted in experiences from conception, pregnancy, infancy or early childhood, before language and explicit memory were available.
That idea aligns with wider trauma research. Daniel Siegel and other developmental specialists have described how early experience is stored largely through implicit systems such as sensation, emotion and procedure rather than narrative memory, while Bessel van der Kolk has long argued that trauma is often held in the body as physical and emotional response. A 2021 clinical model published in a Taylor & Francis journal also framed preverbal medical trauma as a dyadic issue, showing how early illness or hospitalisation can affect the child-caregiver bond and leave children expressing distress through behaviour rather than recollection. Taken together, these studies support Del Vecchio-Scully’s view that a lack of autobiographical memory does not mean a lack of traumatic impact.
Her article also places preverbal trauma within a broader developmental context. Early separation, neonatal intensive care, traumatic birth, caregiver depression or anxiety, adoption and prolonged stress can all disrupt attachment and nervous system regulation, even when no single event looks obviously traumatic in isolation. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis found that early EMDR interventions after traumatic events can reduce post-traumatic symptoms in the short term, suggesting that timely treatment may matter even before memories are fully organised. Other recent research has also shown that EMDR can quickly reduce distress and change the vividness and emotional force of traumatic material, which helps explain why the approach is seen as useful for deeply embedded experiences.
The treatment implications are practical. Del Vecchio-Scully recommends a slower, more relational approach that pays close attention to safety, attunement and somatic cues rather than pushing for a neat narrative. She suggests history-taking that explores pregnancy, birth, early caregiving and gaps in memory, alongside preparation techniques such as resource building, attachment-focused support and body awareness. When processing begins, she says the target may emerge through body sensations, impulses, images, dreams or recurring emotional states rather than a clear scene from childhood. The goal is not to force recovery of forgotten memories, but to help clients process what the nervous system has carried for years.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment.





