As screen use among teenagers continues to rise, experts argue for a balanced approach that recognises the importance of social play, both online and outdoors, in supporting young people’s identity, resilience, and well-being.
Teenagers are not younger children, and that matters when adults think about play, screens and the outdoors. In an article for Learning Through Landscapes, Polly Baker argued that adolescent play is often misunderstood because it does not look like den-building or other childhood pastimes. The point, she suggested, is not to shut it down but to recognise its social value and make space for it.
That view is backed by research showing that play and leisure remain important well into adolescence. A study indexed by the National Library of Medicine links recreation with identity, autonomy, competence, initiative and social connection, while a separate review in Current Directions in Psychological Science says social gaming can support peer relationships, identity formation and emotional development. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also said play helps build resilience, co-operation and problem-solving. Taken together, the evidence suggests the issue is not simply screen versus no screen, but what kind of activity is replacing what.
Learning Through Landscapes also warns against treating all screen use as equally harmful. Its argument is that digital life can be part of a healthy balance, especially when young people are given appealing alternatives such as geocaching or other outdoor activities that combine technology with movement and exploration. The organisation says boredom has a role too, because idleness can lead to imagination and invention rather than passivity.
The hardest question may be who loses most if social media use is restricted. Nicola Killean, Scotland’s children’s commissioner, has said children in rural areas, those with family overseas, disabled children and young people who rely on online spaces for identity, support or community may be especially affected. Amnesty International has made similar points, arguing that any serious debate about bans must also consider digital rights and the needs of marginalised teenagers. Learning Through Landscapes says the wider task is to weigh risks and benefits more honestly, and to make sure young people have somewhere to go, something to do and room to grow.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
